Rocky Reviews compared
Considering a Cubic alternative? Compare the review tradeoffs.
Cubic combines AI pull request reviews with codebase scanning and automation. Rocky is being built for teams that want AI to organize review context while a person decides which findings become feedback.
The short answer
Rocky keeps the final review decision with your team.
The clearest difference is the approval boundary. Cubic advertises automatic approval for low risk PRs and coding agent fixes. Rocky’s stated design keeps AI findings as drafts for a human to accept, edit, or dismiss before they are posted. Rocky is an open source project in active development, so check its current documentation for what is available today.
Compare the review approach
Different tools, different priorities.
When to consider Rocky
Keep AI useful. Keep the call yours.
Consider Rocky if your team wants an open source, self managed option and wants a person to make the final call on every AI drafted finding. Consider Cubic if you want a broader automation workflow, including low risk automatic approvals and scheduled codebase scans. The better fit depends on how much autonomy your team wants to give its review tooling.
For current product details, see Cubic code review features . This page describes Rocky’s focus and is not an exhaustive feature checklist.